Modernity means cities \u2013 or so we\u2019re told. This bold new study of those who make their living from the land argues otherwise<\/p>\n
The word \u201cpeasant\u201d has a negative edge: it has come to mean someone ignorant, unsophisticated, lowborn. Such an attitude, writes Maraym Aslany in this impressive piece of anthropology-cum-history, is \u201ca residue of the massive psychodrama which made us who we are \u2026 we became modern by expelling the peasant parts of ourselves\u201d. Her book weaves together a global history of peasants and an account of the four years she spent travelling in India, Cambodia, Peru and Ghana, living with and talking to peasant families.<\/p>\n
She aims to challenge the notion that the decline of the peasantry is the necessary condition for becoming \u201cmodern\u201d. This notion arose in Britain, the first country to rid itself of its peasants when, with the enclosure acts, it turned its land from a common good into a financial asset. As this model of capitalist modernity began to take over the world, intellectuals of every stripe argued that peasants stood in the way of \u201cprogress\u201d. Voltaire saw them as slow-witted people unable to understand their piteous state, stumbling blocks in the pursuit of enlightenment. Karl Marx believed that their \u201crelentless property fanaticism\u201d made them a reactionary element within capitalism.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/i.guim.co.uk\/img\/media\/e069c6c016655fb8b3fe1eec51aee788c9355083\/295_0_2953_2362\/master\/2953.jpg?width=140&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=69efda57d6810749fc179dedf246c9a5\" "\\"Peasants")
<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"